Teenamite

The Teenamite member's area is quite simple. The overall look is quite similar to that of the free tour. At the very top of the member's page you'll find links to the latest updates, top rated updates, most viewed, your personal favorites page and the search engine. Immediately below this, you'll see thumbnail previews of the next 5 updates due to be added to the member's area. All of the updates are dated, and I was pleasantly surprised to see that Teenamite updates on a daily basis. Updates alternate between pictures and videos. So one day you'll get a photo gallery and the next day a video scene.

Currently, the site features 165+ updates (85 videos and 80 picture galleries). I must say other than being impressed by the daily updates, I was also impressed at the number of scenes already available. These days, sites seem to launch with just a dozen scenes available. Sometimes less. Although it's worth pointing out that I couldn't find any information about whether or not the content inside Teenamite is exclusive. I think with this kind of update schedule, it's safe to say the content probably isn't exclusive.

Each scene or gallery is laid out with several thumbnail images and a description of the scene. You'll also find the option to rate the scene, along with its current rating. You'll see the names of the models appearing in the scene, too. This is especially handy when you see a girl you quite like and want to see more of her. Most of the girls in Teenamite make multiple appearances. This gorgeous redhead named Jiri caught my eye. I clicked on her name and much to my delight discovered she had appeared in 4 photo galleries and 3 video scenes!

Picture quality is extremely impressive. The resolutions are huge, with photos measuring in at 2464x1643 pixels in size. Unfortunately there are no ZIP files available for each gallery. The galleries are quite large too. Expect between 150 and 200 pictures in each.

Members are spoiled for choice when it comes to videos. Although I was a little confused by some of their decisions. The content is shot in HD, but the video options made available are, well, odd. For example, you can choose between 3 different quality levels in WMV format. The lowest quality version measure 720x540 pixels, encoded at 1.7 Mbps (1740kbps). Next up are the medium quality HD videos in 720p (that's 1280x720 pixels encoded at 5.25Mbps/5376kbps). Naturally, you'd expect the high quality videos to be 1080p, right? Well, sort of. They're not the expected 1920x1080 pixels you'd expect Instead, they're 1440x1080 pixels encoded at 6.25 Mbps (6400kbps). That's a 4:3 aspect ratio, compared to the 16:9 widescreen aspect offered by the medium quality videos. Personally, I prefer the widescreen option. Also available are MPEG and QuickTime formats and a streaming flash video option, too.